Skip to content

What he said, Part II: the Rays

July 22, 2011

Like many around the Tampa Bay area, Tampasphere is getting quite weary of the entire (lack of real) discussion surrounding the Rays and Tropicana Field.  This week brought a whole new batch of comments.  Some of the oddest appeared in this article in the Times (plus some more in this Times article) which discussed the attempts by the Rays to bring more fans to the Trop while simultaneously trying to get a new stadium moving along.

While the entire issue is a muddle of the obvious mixed with conjecture, statistics, and intercity rivalry, the mayor of St. Petersburg, who has basically taken a do-nothing approach, said it best (though we do not think he meant to):

“I truly think the organization as a whole wants to promote not just the product as a whole, but the house in which they play,” Foster said. “I think it was frustration more than anything else.”

Why, yes, that summarizes it perfectly.  The Rays are obviously trying to promote their product.  Because their product is presently located in the Trop, they are trying to get people to go to the Trop. On the other hand, they are frustrated because the Trop is, and has been, obsolete as a Major League Baseball stadium, and everyone, aside from the Mayor of St. Petersburg, seems to know that. (We think he knows it, too, but what can you do?)  The Rays are frustrated because there is no useful discussion regarding the new stadium issue, namely because the government in St. Petersburg is attempting to stifle any creative thinking about it and about relieving St. Petersburg of debt (Actually we find it odd that some claim to want to protect the St. Pete taxpayer and yet, by insisting on the stadium being located in St. Pete, are basically saying they want to put the St. Pete taxpayer on the hook for whatever public money goes into the project for decades to come).

But, frankly, instead of reiterating arguments, Tampasphere prefers to let THIS COLUMN from the Times explain it.

Advertisements
One Comment leave one →
  1. Answer Mam permalink
    July 23, 2011 9:44 PM

    Is everyone aware that the SP times coverage s slanted becuase they are in a corproate strategic marketing agreement, a lurtive one, with the Rays? They never reaveal thsi bias yet force feed us front page stories aboutt he trop all the time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: